Motivation and self-esteem in educational psychology programs
El TDAH y portarse mal
¿Su hijo adolescente no se despierta cuando debe porque ha olvidado poner el despertador? ¿Le riñen por llegar tarde al instituto y por haber olvidado el trabajo del día en casa? ¿Lo han tenido que castigar sin recreo porque ha armado lío en la clase? Éste podría ser un día cualquiera de un chico sin diagnosticar con Trastorno de Déficit de Atención e Hiperactividad, TDAH. Entrevista a María Jesús Ordóñez y Roberto Álvarez-Higuera, padres de un niño que ya está diagnosticado de TDAH, y han querido compartir su experiencia, sus años de desasosiego and misunderstanding, through a book "You are not alone", a testimony that will provide answers and hope to many families.
Source:
http://www.rtve.es/mediateca/videos/20110208/tdah-portarse-mal/1010301.shtml
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
Past Church Street New Years Eve
VAT and Leijonhufvud
few days ago I heard a dealer complaining about the amount of VAT payable. The complaint was based on if it had been more cautious and bought goods could have avoided all or part of the tax.
This complaint made me reflect and draw the following conclusion: the complaint is unfounded and VAT "finances" the accumulation of stocks. Why unfounded? Because to avoid paying VAT should never accumulate stocks trade continuously by the same amount for the tax and this clearly is not a long-term equilibrium. You can temporarily prevent your stock but when you reduce the tax paid at the time did not pay.
Reasoning in the same way also concluded that the tax used to finance the accumulation of stocks. Before a decision to combine goods, such purchases represent more tax credits for the trader, who uses them to make debits from sales and thus pay a lesser amount (or zero). The key is the system of credits and debits, which can avoid paying value-added generated today at the expense of a higher payment to be made in the future when more stock that is settled.
This complaint made me reflect and draw the following conclusion: the complaint is unfounded and VAT "finances" the accumulation of stocks. Why unfounded? Because to avoid paying VAT should never accumulate stocks trade continuously by the same amount for the tax and this clearly is not a long-term equilibrium. You can temporarily prevent your stock but when you reduce the tax paid at the time did not pay.
Reasoning in the same way also concluded that the tax used to finance the accumulation of stocks. Before a decision to combine goods, such purchases represent more tax credits for the trader, who uses them to make debits from sales and thus pay a lesser amount (or zero). The key is the system of credits and debits, which can avoid paying value-added generated today at the expense of a higher payment to be made in the future when more stock that is settled.
PD 1: It is assumed that there is no escape (partially) the tax, if any is complemented by the approach and therefore does not change.
PD 2: Maybe the complaint could have been referred to miss the opportunity to rebuild stocks using money earmarked to pay taxes.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Minor Labia Stretching
overstocking by bike
Interesting note on VOX Axel Leijonhufvud.
Brief summary (not literally) for lazy and Anglophobe: any financial crisis involves a collective error in the perception of wealth. The subsequent adjustment requires the distribution of the losses generated by these errors between the different actors in the economy. In the context of a market crisis or allow the judges assigned to these losses lead to a resurgence of it. In response, the State should undertake the dual task of punishing those who took undue risks but also to avoid a widespread collapse of the payments system.
In this regard, noting that the loss allocation mechanism which implicitly applies the U.S. government is unfair and not transparent. According to the author, the Reserve Federal offers liquidity at rates close to zero to private banks that can be channeled to the purchase of Treasury Bonds with a nominal yield of 3 to 4 percentage points. Banks, meanwhile, strengthen their balance sheets to pay the difference in performance at the expense of American taxpayers that this mechanism is slowly paying spurious losses of financial institutions. Finally, warning about the dangers of this procedure if not so distant future Federal Reserve is forced to raise rates to stop inflation pressures (which would increase the funding cost of banks would be barefoot with respect to government bonds).
So much for the note of AL.
Two comments in the margin, if the Fed funds to banks and these provide funds to the Treasury, is there not a mechanism underlying deficit financing by the Federal Reserve?
And a little more superficial: the district, would not you say this bike?
Brief summary (not literally) for lazy and Anglophobe: any financial crisis involves a collective error in the perception of wealth. The subsequent adjustment requires the distribution of the losses generated by these errors between the different actors in the economy. In the context of a market crisis or allow the judges assigned to these losses lead to a resurgence of it. In response, the State should undertake the dual task of punishing those who took undue risks but also to avoid a widespread collapse of the payments system.
In this regard, noting that the loss allocation mechanism which implicitly applies the U.S. government is unfair and not transparent. According to the author, the Reserve Federal offers liquidity at rates close to zero to private banks that can be channeled to the purchase of Treasury Bonds with a nominal yield of 3 to 4 percentage points. Banks, meanwhile, strengthen their balance sheets to pay the difference in performance at the expense of American taxpayers that this mechanism is slowly paying spurious losses of financial institutions. Finally, warning about the dangers of this procedure if not so distant future Federal Reserve is forced to raise rates to stop inflation pressures (which would increase the funding cost of banks would be barefoot with respect to government bonds).
So much for the note of AL.
Two comments in the margin, if the Fed funds to banks and these provide funds to the Treasury, is there not a mechanism underlying deficit financing by the Federal Reserve?
And a little more superficial: the district, would not you say this bike?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)